Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
School of Social Work
About the University
Mission of the School
Degree Programs Available
Tuition and Fees
Financial Aid
Student Life and Services
Academic Policies and Procedures
Student Responsibility to Keep Informed
Programs of Study
Registration and Course Information
Class Schedules and Hours
Grades and Records
Scholastic Standing
Student Grievance/ Complaint Procedures
Policy on Academic Integrity Summary
University Code of Student Conduct Summary
Authority for Student Discipline
University Safety and Security
Administrative Procedures for Responding to Disruptions
Policy Prohibiting Harassment
Policy Against Verbal Assault, Defamation, and Harassment
Nondiscrimination Policy
National Association of Social Workers Code of Ethics: Summary of Major Principles
Equity in Athletics Disclosure Act Reports
Graduation Rates
Teacher Preparation Program Pass Rates
Student Records and Privacy Rights
Student Residency for Tuition Purposes
Research Policy and Research Centers
Patent Policy
Baccalaureate Program
Master of Social Work Program
Course Listing
Administration and Faculty
Field Agencies
Governance of the University
Divisions of the University
Camden Newark New Brunswick/Piscataway
  School of Social Work 2005-2007 Academic Policies and Procedures University Code of Student Conduct Summary Process  


The following summary presents key aspects of the code. Students should consult the code itself for complete information on each point.

Filing a Complaint

Any individual may file a complaint against a student suspected of violating the code by notifying the dean of students (or equivalent) of the respondent`s college or school, or the assistant director of judicial affairs in the Office of Compliance, Student Policy, and Judicial Affairs.

Preliminary Review

Upon receipt of a complaint, a preliminary review is conducted by the dean of students (or equivalent) or his or her designee to assess the evidence and determine if it is sufficient to proceed to a hearing. The dean conducting this review also assesses the seriousness of the charges. The most serious charges can, upon a finding of responsibility, result in separation from the university (suspension or expulsion). These serious cases are decided at university hearings. Less seriousoffenses (nonseparable offenses) are heard according to procedures in place at the student`s college or school.

Separable Offenses

The following offenses are deemed serious enough to result potentially in separation from the university should a student be found responsible at a hearing:

1. violations of academic integrity

2. forgery, unauthorized alteration or unauthorized use of any university documents or records or any instrument or form of identification

3. intentionally furnishing false information to the university or intentionally initiating or causing to be initiated any false report, warning, or threat of fire, explosion, or other emergency

4. use of force against any person or property or the threat of such force

5. sexual assault or nonconsensual sexual contact

6. hazing

7. violation of the university's Student Life Policy against Verbal Assault, Defamation, and Harassment (Copies are available from the judicial affairs office or dean of students' office.)

8. unauthorized entry into, unauthorized use of, or misuse of university property, including computers and data and voice communication networks

9. intentionally or recklessly endangering the welfare of anyindividual or intentionally or recklessly interfering with any university activity or university-sponsored activity

10. use, possession, or storage of any weapon, dangerous chemical, fireworks, or explosive, whether or not a federal or state license to possess the same has been issued to the possessor

11. the distribution of alcohol, narcotics, or dangerous drugs on university property or among members of the university community, if such distribution is illegal, or the possession of a sufficiently large quantity as to indicate an intention to distribute illegally

12. theft of university services or theft of, or intentional or reckless damage to, university property or property in the possession of, or owned by, a member of the university community, including the knowing possession of stolen property (Intentional or reckless misuse of fire safety equipment is regarded as damage under this section of the code.)

13. the violation of the ethical code of one's intended profession either by graduate students enrolled in any of the university`s professional or graduate schools or by undergraduate students in clinical courses or settings related to their intended profession

14. violations of federal, state, or local law where such violations have an adverse effect on the educational mission of the university

15. failure to comply with the lawful directions of university officials, including campus police officers acting in performance of their duties

16. knowingly providing false testimony or evidence; disruption or interference with the orderly conduct of a disciplinary conference or hearing; violating the terms of any disciplinary sanction imposed in accordance with this code; or any other abuse of the university`s disciplinary procedures

Campus Advisers

Both complainants and respondents may select a campus adviser to assist them during the disciplinary process. Campus advisers may fully represent students, including speaking on their behalf. The Office of Compliance, Student Policy, and Judicial Affairsmaintains a list of trained campus advisers for this purpose. Students are free to select any members of the university community to serve as their advisers, whether they are on the list or not.


Complainants and respondents also may, at their own expense, seek the advice of an attorney in addition to that of a campus adviser. Attorneys are free to advise students, to assist in the preparation of their cases, and to attend hearings, but may not speak on behalf of their clients or question witnesses at a hearing.

University Hearings

University hearings are presided over by a hearing officer and heard by a hearing board usually composed of three students and two faculty members. It is the hearing board's responsibility to determine whether the accused student is responsible or not responsible for violating the code. If the hearing board determines a student to be responsible by the standard of clear and convincing evidence, it also recommends a sanction for the offense to the vice president for student affairs. The vice president for student affairs considers the hearing board recommendation and determines the sanction.


A student found responsible for violating the code may appeal the finding, the sanction, or both. Appeals are filed through the Office of Compliance, Student Policy, and Judicial Affairs, which forwards them to the Appeals Committee of the appropriate campus (Camden, Newark, New Brunswick/Piscataway).

For additional information, contact RU-info at 732/932-info (4636) or
Comments and corrections to: Campus Information Services.

2005 Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey. All rights reserved.