Completion of course
requirements does not guarantee a passing mark on the qualifying examination.
Students are expected to read well beyond required course readings in preparing
for the qualifying examination. Prospective candidates for the doctorate should
understand that they will not ordinarily be permitted to proceed to the
qualifying examination unless their record in coursework shows evidence of
distinction, meaning, in general, a B+ or better average, and their coursework
has been completed by the semester in which the qualifying examination is
taken.
Qualifying exams cover the
areas of coursework specialization (as stipulated in each program area). The
qualifying exam consists of both a written and oral portion. The written
portion (involving two questions covering two distinct areas
of study) is take-home with a limit of ten days for the student's completion
from the day the examination commences. The oral portion of the exam is
scheduled after the written exam is submitted to an examination committee of
four faculty members who serve as readers of the written portion. If a student
does not pass any portion of the exam, one additional opportunity is provided
for the student to retake the exam.
-
The functions of the
qualifying examination are: to determine that the student is adequately
prepared to embark on the research required for producing a dissertation; and,
that the student has sufficient knowledge to be a member of the academy in the
student's discipline.
-
The qualifying examination
consists of two portions: the written and the oral. Typically, students are
given the written examination questions on a Friday morning, and submit their
answers to the questions on a Monday 10 days hence. Exam dates are determined
by the student and his or her
committee, but should not be
conducted past the 12th week of each semester without approval from all
committee members. Within two weeks of submitting the written answers, the oral
examination is scheduled.
-
The written portion of the
qualifying examination for all students consists of answers to two different
questions. Each question must be read by at least two examiners, and there must
be at least four different examiners in total. The four examiners constitute
the examination committee.
-
Each program area
determines for itself what the questions cover, within the constraints of the
program description for that area. Library and Information Science (LIS)
requires that students study in two areas: an LIS area, and an area from
outside LIS. This means that the student must answer one question relevant to
each of the two areas in which s/he has studied. In Communication, students
must have a major and minor area of study. These may include foci within the
Communication area: organizational communication, social interaction, mediated
communication, or health communication; but are not
limited to these areas of communication study. Students may choose as a minor
area one of the other areas of the Ph.D. program, or a minor elsewhere in the
university. In Media Studies, there is no requirement to study in more than one
area, so the two questions may cover whatever aspects of
Media Studies the examination committee considers relevant.
- For cases in which the
student is to answer a written qualifying examination question in an area
different from the program area, at least one examiner of that question must be
from that area. For instance, if the other area is from outside the School of
Communication and Information (SC&I), then at least one of the examiners
must be a member of the graduate faculty of that other area. Or, if the other
area is from within SC&I, at least one of the examiners must be a member of
that program area.
-
The number of questions
that are set, from which the student chooses two to answer, is decided by the
program area: a typical pattern for areas which require students to study in
two areas is two questions for each area, the student choosing one from each of
the two.
-
The examination committee
consists of the chair, determined by mutual agreement of the student and the
faculty member, and at least three other examiners, chosen by the chair in
consultation with the student.
-
The members of the
examination committee may set questions that are generally relevant to the
student's research interests and/or course of study; or they may set questions
that are relevant to the examined area as a whole. Such decisions are made by the
examination committee, within any
constraints that may be set
by the program area.
-
The oral portion of the
qualifying examination is led by the chair of the examination committee, and
includes all four members of that committee. In this portion of the qualifying
examination, the members of the examination committee pose questions to the candidate,
on the subjects of the written questions and/or on subjects related to the
areas in which the student is being examined.
-
There are three options
when evaluating each exam question: Pass, Revise, or Fail. At the conclusion of
the oral portion of the qualifying examination, the members of the examination
committee decide if the student has successfully passed one or both questions,
or if the student will have to provide additional written work for one or both
areas (Revise option), or if the student has failed one or both questions. When
both questions are passed, the student receives a Pass and is admitted to
candidacy for the Ph.D. (the members will sign the Candidacy Form and give it back to
the student to return to the Ph.D. Office). The Revise option allows the
student to rewrite the answer(s) or provide additional written work related to
the same question(s), which would need to satisfy the student's committee (but
with no additional oral exam). This is appropriate when the student has not demonstrated satisfactory
performance, but has not failed the question (and could pass with additional
revisions). One month is allowed for satisfactory revisions (which then results
in a Pass for that question or questions); failure to do a satisfactory
revision results in a Fail for that question or questions. There can be
only one revision, and that will be a pass/fail decision. The Fail option
requires the student to re-sit the examination in those areas where the student
has not achieved a Pass, including an additional oral exam. A minimum of three
favorable votes is needed before one is considered to have passed some or all
of the examination. One must ultimately pass both questions to Pass the
qualifying exams.
-
Additional instructions:
The committee members will receive a copy of the exam and a copy of the
evaluation form, and will bring it with them to the oral exam. A copy of the
form from each committee member will be given to the student after the oral
exam, unless the committee decides it would not be helpful for the student to
receive feedback in that form. The committee chairs should bring the student's
Candidacy Form to the oral exam.
- Re-sitting the examination
means providing new questions for the required area(s), submission of answers
to the question(s), and an oral examination in the area(s). The two examiners
for each question read the new papers and participate in the new oral portion
of the examination. If the student has failed in respect to both questions all
four examiners participate in the reading of the new questions and in the new
oral portion of the examination. Students may re-sit the qualifying
examination only once.