Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
School of Criminal Justice
 
About the University
About the School of Nursing
Admission to the School of Nursing
Student Life and Services
Clinical Learning
Academic Policies and Procedures
School of Nursing Student Standards of Conduct
Essential Functions for Nursing
Academic Advising
Center for Academic Success
Grades and Records
Other Grade Symbols
Credit Prefixes
Semester Grade Reports
Warning Notices
Student Complaints about Grades
Transfer Credit from Institutions Other Than Rutgers
Transfer Credit from Other Divisions within Rutgers
Double Major
Minor
Academic/Scholastic Standing
Time Limit for Degrees
Attendance and Examinations
Communicable Disease Policy
Library and Learning Resource Centers Material
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Academic Integrity Policy
University Code of Student Conduct Summary
Peer-to-Peer File Sharing
University Safety and Security
Office for Violence Prevention and Victim Assistance
Services for Students with Disabilities
Adminstrative Procedures for Responding to Disruptions
Policy Prohibiting Discrimination and Harassment
Policy against Verbal Assault, Harassment, Intimidation, Bullying, and Defamation
Drug-Free Schools and Campuses Act
Equity in Athletics Disclosure Act Reports
Graduation Rates
Teacher Preparation Program Pass Rates
Student Records and Privacy Rights under FERPA
Student Residency for Tuition Purposes
Research Policy
Patent Policy
Bachelor of Science Program
Professional School Certificate Programs
Master of Science Programs
Post-Master's Certificate Program
Doctor of Nursing Practice (D.N.P.) Programs
Doctoral (Ph.D.) in Nursing Program
Doctoral (Ph.D.) in Urban Studies Program
Administration and Faculty
Divisions of the University
Camden Newark New Brunswick/Piscataway
Catalogs
  School of Nursing 2015–2017 Academic Policies and Procedures Grades and Records Student Complaints about Grades  

Student Complaints about Grades


The university and the School of Nursing recognize that it is the faculty member's prerogative to determine a grade. Faculty members are expected to set fair and consistent grading policies in their courses. The responsibility for resolving grade disputes is shared among the faculty member, the student, the program, and the school.

Students have the right to know the components of their final grade, which is included in each course syllabi. If a student perceives that their final course grade was based on anything other than academic performance, an appeal may be filed. Rutgers University's policy pertaining to discrimination and harassment may be found at: http://policies.rutgers.edu/sites/policies/files/60.1.12%20-%20current.pdf.

While students have the right to file an appeal, dissatisfaction with a grade or failure to notify the faculty of personal circumstances which may have affected academic performance are not grounds for a grade appeal. Mathematical errors do not require a grade appeal, but should be brought to the attention of the faculty. In the case of a successful grievance, the grade does not automatically change, rather the committee makes recommendations as to appropriate student/faculty measures to be taken.   

The Process

The student shall attempt to reconcile the conflict or question by direct interaction (e.g., email, phone, or face-to-face conversation) with the involved faculty member(s) upon receipt of the grade, but no later than three academic days (days on which the university is open for business) after official posting of the grade in Banner or REGIS. In the event the faculty member is not available, the student will contact the course leader/specialty director, who will attempt to contact the faculty member. If the faculty member or specialty director is unavailable to meet with the student, the student will be referred to the appropriate academic associate dean who will intercede on the student's behalf to contact the faculty.

When the grade results in a course failure and that course is a prerequisite for following courses, the student may not progress to those courses. For students who are scheduled to start a course before the grievance process is completed, they may request special permission from the appropriate academic associate dean to continue coursework until the appeal is resolved. The student will be advised that if the grade is upheld on appeal that they will be required to withdraw from the class.

Following unsuccessful resolution with the faculty member, the student has three academic days to meet with the Senior Associate Dean for Student Services or designee to discuss the nature of the appeal and for the initiation of the formal grade appeal process if necessary. The student will be guided through the process and submit all required material, including the grade appeal form and all documentation to Student Services Operations within five academic days. Documentation should include, but is not limited to, course syllabus, any course material related to the appeal, email correspondence between the student and the faculty member, and a student written statement explaining why he or she feels the appeal meets the criteria for a grievance. The student will receive confirmation from Student Services Operations that the material was received. The Senior Associate Dean for Student Services will review the documents for completeness and send all documents to the Chair of the Grievance Committee

The Chair of the Grievance Committee will determine the level of the student (undergraduate or graduate) and convene a subcommittee. This subcommittee will consist of three faculty members from the Grievance Committee who do not teach in the program the student is enrolled in. Members of the subcommittee will review the appeal material and determine, within three academic days, whether (1) the appeal has no merit (i.e., does not meet the criteria of a grievance) or (2) a full hearing is necessary. The subcommittee may request additional information from the faculty member or the student if that information is needed to make a decision. If the appeal has no merit, the chair will notify the student and faculty member, in writing, of the decision, and provide the rationale. This will be done through Student Services Operations. The student may reject this decision and continue the appeal process. If a full hearing is necessary, it will be scheduled as soon as possible, but no later than five academic days following the decision.

Hearing Process

The chair and the subcommittee will meet with the student and faculty for the purpose of gaining additional information that will help them determine whether the appeal meets the criteria of a grievance. The student may have a support person present, but that person will not participate or speak on behalf of the student during the hearing.

Merits of the appeal evidence (both evidence submitted previously and evidence gained during the hearing) will be discussed immediately following the meeting with the student and faculty and the subcommittee will make a decision. The decision will be either (1) the appeal is justified (meets criteria for a grievance) or (2) the appeal is not justified. If it is determined that the appeal is not justified, the chair will notify the student and faculty in writing within two days through Student Services Operations. This letter will be sent by email along with postal delivery using regular delivery and overnight or certified mail. If it is determined that the appeal is justified, the subcommittee will make a recommendation as to the appropriate student/faculty measures to be taken.

The student or the faculty may reject the decision of the subcommittee and continue the appeal process by notification in writing to Student Services Operations. All materials and decisions submitted previously will be sent to the appropriate Academic Associate Dean of Student Services. The associate dean will review all material and may also request additional material or request to see the student and/or faculty member for the purpose of gaining additional information that will help him or her render a decision. The associate dean may either (1) uphold the decision of the subcommittee or (2) disagree with the subcommittee's decision. If the decision is upheld, the student, faculty, and Chair of the Grievance Committee will be notified in writing. If the associate dean disagrees with the decision, the Chair of the Grievance Committee must be notified and provided with the reasons the decision was not upheld. If necessary, recommendations as to actions to be taken will be made by both the associate dean and the Chair of the Grievance Committee.

For grade grievances that do not result in dismissal from the program, the decision of the associate dean is final. If the grade appeal results in a subsequent program dismissal, the student may reject the decision of the associate dean and continue the appeal process by contacting the dean through Student Services Operations. The same process will be followed and the decision of the dean is final.

Ph.D. students must follow the Graduate School-Newark policy for grade grievances.

 
For additional information, contact RU-info at 732-445-info (4636) or colonel.henry@rutgers.edu.
Comments and corrections to: Campus Information Services.

© 2016 Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey. All rights reserved.