The
School of Public Affairs and Administration Ph.D. program in public administration consists of the knowledge
foundations of the field of public administration and the premise that
performance is a key to effectiveness in the field of public
administration. As with other academic fields, curriculum of the program
is based on the body of received knowledge and current knowledge
accepted by the field.
The Ph.D. faculty is responsible for the curriculum and ongoing
processes of evaluation of curriculum and student performance. Ph.D.
faculty members meet regularly during the academic year. A key element
of these meetings is faculty members' evaluation of emerging literature
in respective fields, and its importance to students' learning and
directions. For example, a shared focus and emphasis emerging from these
dynamics is that of performance. Performance measurement, management,
and improvement are important dimensions of competence, knowledge, and
service in public and nonprofit sectors. A performance focus encourages
both facts and purposes of the public and nonprofit sectors, that is,
effectiveness.
Faculty evaluation of curriculum takes place throughout the
academic year in both formal and informal meetings and discussions
sometimes generating formal proposals and sometimes leading to informal
adjustments. Ongoing measures of curriculum and program performance are:
-
qualities of faculty who teach in the program as
measured by faculty performance in relevant academic settings, i.e.,
scholarly contributions, professional contributions, service
contributions, and Ph.D. student performance;
-
curriculum proposals and changes in the context of program and student goals;
-
faculty teaching, assignments and feedback to
students as measured by evaluation of faculty teaching evaluations and
other feedback from Ph.D. students;
-
evaluation of students' understanding of knowledge
foundations and emerging emphases (e.g., performance) as dimensions of
knowledge and practice, measured by grades and faculty feedback;
-
timely student successful completion of curriculum
components (course assignments, papers, exams; summary examinations,
unexplained student incompletes and withdrawals);
-
feedback from professional colleagues about
student competence based on guest lectures and professional conference
interactions with students;
-
successful employment in the academy where that is
the graduate's goal, and effective participation in selected areas of
the academy (papers, publications, participation in professional
associations).
Program Goals
Learning Goal 1: The development and attainment of research, scholarship, and teaching skills in the field of public administration.
Assessment of student achievement, Goal 1:
- Grades in graduate courses.
- Successful
completion of the general comprehensive examination upon completion of
all core courses; successful completion of a specialized field
comprehensive exam upon completion of all field courses; successful
completion of a research methods comprehensive exam and a dissertation
proposal.
- Annual review of students by the PhD Executive Committee, indicating the Advising by student's PhD committee members.
- Successful teaching reviews for those students engaged in teaching and pedagogy.
- Attainment of employment in positions requiring the expertise obtained with the degree.
Role of the program in helping students to achieve Goal 1:
- Close
advising by Ph.D. Director and other faculty mentors in subfields to
ensure that students are being prepared in a coherent and academically
rigorous fashion.
- Effective monitoring of student progress at every stage.
- Mentoring of students who receive low reviews during the annual review of Ph.D. students.
- Assisting
students prepare to make paper presentations at annual national and
regional conferences in public administration, including funding.
- Encouraging students to join professional associations, including funding to join leading association in the field.
- School
newsletter that highlights the publications, presentations, grants,
awards and achievements of both faculty and students in the public
administration program. This serves to illustrate the importance of
communicating research and scholarship to the scientific community and
the general public.
- Evaluations of teaching effectiveness of instructors.
- If effectiveness is below expectations, work with instructors to improve effectiveness.
- Review
of the curriculum by the Ph.D. Executive Committee to insure that
course offerings are sufficient and current in content.
- Providing guidance on job market preparation.
Learning Goal 2: Conducting and producing original research.Assessment of student achievement, Goal 2:
- Attendance and presentations (posters or talks) at regional and national conferences during the graduate career.
- Attending biweekly seminars offered by the school; presenting at least once at such seminars.
- Attainment of internal and external grants/fellowships for research.
- Attainment of awards for research.
- Submission and acceptance of peer-reviewed articles.
- Completion and defense of Ph.D. proposal by end of third or fourth year.
Role of program in helping students achieve Goal 2:
- Advise
students to meet with their Ph.D. adviser and committee frequently to
act as mentors throughout the student's graduate career.
- Introduce students to research possibilities during orientation for new students and during the first semester.
- Assisting students prepare presentations at biweekly seminars.
- Assisting students prepare paper presentation for regional and national conferences.
- Providing funding for students to attend conferences.
- Track publications and presentations, and nominate eligible student candidates for awards.
- Provide advising at every stage of the program, both from field experts and from Ph.D. director.
- Nominating eligible dissertations for "Best Dissertation Award" in the field.
- Advise students on avenues and opportunities for publishing dissertation, including books.
- Opportunities to write and submit grants for external funding.
Learning Goal 3: Professional career preparation.
Assessment of graduate student achievement, Goal 3:
- Student teaching evaluations.
- Assist in preparation of curriculum vita.
- Advisement on relevant places to submit applications.
- Track number of publications, presentations, and outreach activities.
- Placement of students upon completion of degree.
Role of graduate program in helping students to achieve Goal 3:
- Provide
students with an academic culture that fosters professionalism by
treating students as junior colleagues and expecting them to act in that
manner.
- Provide students with access to teaching skills classes both within the program.
- Provide
networking opportunities by providing access to seminar speakers and
visiting scholars through one-on-one meetings, funding to regional and
national meetings and professional organizations.
- Keep students informed of the academic job opportunities available to them.
- Keep students informed of professional development opportunities as they become available through the university.